Two Gilas, one nation: How different national teams kept Philippine basketball burning in 2025

A basketball player from the Philippine national team celebrates by waving the Philippine flag after a victory in a crowded arena.

Philippine basketball lived a split-screen existence in 2025, defined not by a single Gilas Pilipinas roster but by two contrasting national team stories that, in their own ways, sustained the country’s enduring obsession with the game.

One was anchored on structure and continuity, the other on improvisation and resilience. Together, they reflected the evolving realities of international basketball and the unique pressures of representing a nation where every possession is scrutinized.

For Gilas Pilipinas under Tim Cone, the year revolved around discipline and restraint. Cone doubled down on a compact player pool, believing that cohesion mattered more than experimentation in a calendar stacked with international windows.

A group of jubilant Filipino basketball players in white jerseys celebrating a victory, showing expressions of excitement and camaraderie on the court.

With limited preparation time and overlapping tournaments, he preferred familiarity over expansion, even as critics questioned whether depth was being sacrificed for control.

The approach was tested repeatedly. Gilas navigated a demanding stretch that included the FIBA Asia Cup in Saudi Arabia and successive qualifier windows that featured bruising road losses to Chinese Taipei and New Zealand. The absence of Kai Sotto, sidelined by an ACL injury, loomed large, forcing Cone to rework rotations and rely heavily on established pillars.

June Mar Fajardo, Scottie Thompson, CJ Perez, Chris Newsome, Justin Brownlee, Dwight Ramos, AJ Edu, Carl Tamayo and Kevin Quiambao formed the program’s backbone, with Quentin Millora-Brown emerging as a key addition after winning his eligibility appeal.

Cone’s insistence on staying the course drew mixed reactions, but he remained firm that stability would pay dividends in the long run. Invitations to younger guards such as RJ Abarrientos and Juan Gomez de Liaño offered glimpses of renewal without abandoning the core philosophy. For better or worse, the message was clear: Gilas would move forward on its own terms.

While Cone managed continuity, Norman Black stepped into a very different challenge. Tasked with leading the national team in the Southeast Asian Games, Black found himself assembling and reassembling lineups amid shifting eligibility rules and last-minute restrictions.

Naturalized players and those without early-issued passports were ruled out, forcing a late pivot to an all-local roster.

What emerged was a group built on urgency rather than familiarity. Veteran PBA names like Robert Bolick, Poy Erram and Dalph Panopio were blended with free agent Jamie Malonzo, collegiate big man Cedrick Manzano, and holdovers such as Ray Parks Jr., Matthew Wright and Thirdy Ravena. Preparation time was scarce, expectations uncertain, and the margin for error slim.

Yet the team found its rhythm when it mattered most. Gilas clawed back from deficits against Malaysia and Vietnam, survived Indonesia in the semifinals, and then stared down a hostile crowd and contentious whistles in the final against host Thailand.

The gold-medal win was sealed by Malonzo’s all-around play and Bolick’s late-game poise, capped by a now-iconic “night night” gesture that instantly entered Gilas lore.

Black later described the campaign as a crucible that forged unity through adversity. The lack of star power, paradoxically, became a strength, sharpening the group’s focus on a single objective: winning.

By year’s end, Philippine basketball had no shortage of debate. Questions lingered about pool sizes, eligibility rules, and long-term direction. But what remained undeniable was the connection between the team and its supporters.

Whether through Cone’s methodical program or Black’s make-do-and-deliver run, Gilas once again gave Filipinos something to argue about, rally behind, and celebrate.

In a year of contrasting philosophies and shared pressure, the national team did what it has always done best. It mirrored the passion of a basketball nation that demands results, embraces drama, and never stops caring.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading