(Photo courtesy of Senate)
The prosecution panel in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte maintained that alleged violations of the Constitution form the basis of the impeachment case against the country’s second-highest official.
In a report dated October 17, the prosecution emphasized the constitutional issues surrounding the allegations against Duterte as proceedings before the Senate impeachment court continue.
The impeachment case centers on allegations of wrongdoing that prosecutors argue warrant accountability under the Constitution.
Under Article XI of the 1987 Constitution, the President, Vice President, and other impeachable officials may be removed from office for culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust.
The prosecution has pursued allegations concerning Duterte’s wealth and financial disclosures, including questions about assets and funds allegedly not properly reflected in her Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALNs).
The Senate impeachment court earlier allowed the withdrawal of three articles of impeachment, leaving the article concerning alleged unexplained wealth as the remaining charge for consideration.
With the prosecution having rested its case, the defense is expected to present its evidence in accordance with the impeachment court’s schedule and rulings.
Duterte retains the right to contest the allegations and present evidence in her defense.
The impeachment court will ultimately determine whether the evidence establishes grounds for conviction under the Constitution.
